Early Detection of Corrosion – Induced Failures in Electronic Components

Failures in Electronic Components: Corrosion is one of the most prevalent failure modes in electronic components. This leads to various issues ranging from component longevity to functional reliability. It can be caused by various environmental conditions, such as humidity, temperature, and acidity. It can manifest in multiple ways, such as surface pitting, component degradation, and irreversible damage. If left untreated, corrosion can lead to catastrophic failures in the field, resulting in costly recalls and damaged reputations. However, in many cases, it affects the longevity of the products by increasing their failure rate and shortening its mean time between failures.

In this article, we propose an AI-driven method for the early detection of corrosion contamination on soldering leads before they are assembled onto printed circuit boards (PCBs). This method relies on the correlation between the visual appearance of the leads and the extent of their corrosion. Corroded leads have noticeably rougher surfaces, pitting spots, and different light reflectance patterns than pristine leads. An AI model can be trained to detect these differneces in the component’s pictures and flag them for inspection.

We present a real-world study in which corroded components were successfully detected during the pick-and-place process.  SEM/EDS and cross-section analysis were conducted to confirm the AI failure predictions on multiple components with corrosion in a full-scale production environment.

 

Youtube

Read next 

Related Posts

Sourcing funner

An Earthquake Exposed More Than a Supply Chain Risk. It Exposed a Visibility Problem.

The recent Kumamoto earthquake is a reminder that regional disruptions can quickly ripple through the global electronics supply chain—just as the Fukushima disaster did in 2011. Most OEMs have supplier diversification policies and approved alternative vendors. The real question is whether those alternatives are actually being used in production. In one OEM analysis, the Approved Vendor List (AVL) showed a highly diversified sourcing strategy, yet production data revealed that nearly 30% of components were sourced from a single supplier, creating a hidden concentration risk. Supply chain disruptions don't create hidden dependencies—they expose them. Visual AI enables manufacturers to continuously measure supplier concentration from the products they actually build, turning diversification from a policy into a measurable reality.

Who Verifies the Chip That Verifies Everything Else?

Intel and Fortinet are jointly developing Fortinet's next generation security processor, SP6, in part to build a more resilient, diversified supply chain. A security chip is still a chip. Once SP6 leaves the fab, it has to survive the same assembly process as every other component, the process where substitution and counterfeiting actually happen. Standard checks, documentation, batch traceability, sampling, confirm what should be true. Only Visual AI, verifying every component's markings, lot and date code, and country of origin as it's placed, confirms what is true. Cybord has already flagged over 30 major non-AVL substitution events in the first six months of the year. None were counterfeits. All were wrong parts that reached the line undetected by standard inspection. For telecom and datacom OEMs, the question isn't whether SP6 performs. It's whether you can prove the SP6 on the board is the genuine part, at the silicon level, every time.

The Tectonic Shift in Electronic Supply Chain Assurance

DFARS Case 2022-D011 marks a shift from documentation to proof, requiring defense suppliers to verify hardware provenance rather than rely solely on paper records. The new rule secures where PCBs come from, but not what gets assembled onto them, leaving component-level risks such as counterfeits, substitutions, and unauthorized parts largely unaddressed. Traditional inspection tools verify manufacturing quality—not component authenticity. Visual AI adds evidence by analyzing the physical characteristics of every installed component to confirm it matches approved hardware. As provenance requirements continue to expand, manufacturers that can provide image-based proof of authentic, approved hardware will gain both a compliance and competitive advantage

Accessibility Toolbar